In our latest Webcast with Dave, Henrietta Treyz, Director of Economic Policy at Veda Partners, joined David Rosenberg to provide a provocative look at the rapidly evolving landscape in Washington and the global U.S. macroeconomic outlook. With a career spent as a Washington insider and advisor, Treyz provided a candid assessment of a president currently operating in “lame-duck” territory ten months before the midterms.
The conversation centres on a pivotal transition: the U.S. is moving from a period of fiscal dominance into a phase of fiscal gridlock. For investors, understanding this shift is critical to navigating the U.S. economic policy outlook over the next two years.
The Looming Tariff Reversal
At the centre of David Rosenberg’s discussion with Henrietta Treyz was the impending Supreme Court ruling on the President’s authority to impose reciprocal tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Treyz posits a controversial but data-backed thesis: if the court strikes down these tariffs, it creates a sort of “Liberation Day” for the U.S. economy.
- A Natural Stimulus: Striking down the IEEPA tariffs could effectively return approximately $1,800 per household to the American public without requiring congressional approval.
- Market Arbitrage: While the market anticipates some disruption, Treyz highlights underappreciated opportunities in the retail and de minimis shipping sectors if the 25% tariff on goods under $800 is allowed to expire.
- Sector Winners: Consumer-facing stocks, including big-box retailers and consumer staples, are positioned as the primary beneficiaries of a post-tariff margin recovery.
Fiscal Gridlock and the 2026 Midterm “Leash”
As we enter a midterm election year, the political “leash” on the administration is tightening. Treyz emphasizes that the Republican majority in the House and Senate is no longer a monolithic block under executive control, as members are beginning to calibrate their candidacies based on their specific districts and primary challengers. With five Republican senators already breaking ranks on key resolutions and more than a dozen House members crossing the aisle on healthcare subsidies, the President is increasingly finding himself in a position where he cannot functionally rely on a partisan majority to advance his agenda.
The legislative calendar further exacerbates this inertia, with government funding deadlines and mandatory recesses eating up the vast majority of the first quarter. Treyz points out that in DC, almost nothing passes unless it absolutely must, and currently, there is no “must-pass” legislation on the horizon. Consequently, major initiatives regarding cryptocurrency, housing reform, or credit card fee caps are likely to stall as the window for action between March and June is the only remaining opportunity before the general election cycle takes over completely. This shift toward a legislative stalemate suggests that the administration will be forced to play with foreign policy rather than domestic lawmaking, effectively ending the era of fiscal dominance in favour of total gridlock.
The Defence of Monetary Independence
The U.S. macroeconomic outlook is further complicated by recent attacks on Federal Reserve independence, including DOJ investigations into Chair Jay Powell. However, Treyz offers a reassuring perspective for those worried about a central bank takeover, noting that the special status of the Fed is likely to be preserved.
- Senate Safeguards: High-ranking senators have already signalled that they’ll block any Fed nominee viewed as unqualified or overly subservient to the executive branch, ensuring the board remains staffed by sufficiently vetted individuals.
- Market Resilience: Just as bond markets pushed back against executive interference in late 2025, the legislative branch is now acting as a primary bulwark for Fed sovereignty by refusing to advance nominations while independence is under threat.
Tax Reform: One-Off Boost vs. Permanent Inflation
The “One Big Beautiful Bill” remains a point of contention among economists. Treyz clarifies that while the corporate benefits were immediate, the individual tax shifts—specifically regarding SALT deductions—are only just beginning to be felt in the 2026 tax year.
While some fear this represents a perpetual inflationary threat, Treyz and Rosenberg discuss it as a one-time level shift. The ultimate economic impact may be muted, as the wealthiest households tend to save their tax refunds or spend them on limited services rather than cycling them back into high-velocity consumption.
Unlock the Full Analysis
Henrietta Treyz’s insights suggest a volatile but opportunity-rich road ahead as Washington grapples with judicial setbacks and electoral pressures. Don’t navigate these major shifts alone.
Dive deeper into the data. Join the Rosenberg Research community for daily insights that cut through the noise. Explore our subscription tiers today.
